Repeal 377A

What Is She Babbling About?
Well I am so sorry if my one signature didn't add on to the already long list of names on what is termed a "Parliamentary Petition", tabled for debate and for the repeal of 377A under what is termed unnatural offences?

I wasn't exactly throwing a party to celebrate WORLD AIDS DAY, nor was I holed up with a sex partner and indulging in erotic sexual pleasures, the kind 377A deems unnatural and repulsive?

Apparently the 2000 odd signatures aren't many enough when compared to the 4000 odd signatures garnered on the other side of the picket line - the appeal to keep 377A.

Gosh..ununatural....that word doesn't sound quite right does it? I have pointed out many other abnormalcies that should be addressed first before we say what is and what isn't unnatural.

For one, it was never natural for women to be both working and bearing babies. And second the natural order of things back then was that the earth was flat and that the earth was at the centre of the universe and yes, even now, the mistaken notion that Singapore is the hub of everything, including funeral parlors.

Now I must hand it to the woman NMP who stood up to speak against sodomy. But it seems that that and oral sex have been repealed for the heteros' coupling.

I suppose her arguments equally apply here then, doesn't it? So what qualms does she have against the rectum and its main function as a waste disposal outlet? Isn't the penis or vagina also a vessel for urea discharge?

Plus don't forget frequent periodic and monthly menstrual waste, menses and OO, blood in the case of the vagina?

Aren't these even more horrific? And a man's mouth or genitalia touches this. YUCKS!

So what exactly is she talking about?